I would echo Mike’s earlier comment that just because they don’t adhere to a
policy of ARINs does not in itself make them Bad. If a Legacy holder decides
to sell his IP block to another party as an example that does not somehow make
them bad. By your definition it may make them an Actor but not necessarily a
Bad Actor. My two cents.
Steven Ryerse
President
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099- Office
[Description: Description: Eclipse Networks Logo_small.png]℠ Eclipse Networks,
Inc.
Conquering Complex Networks℠
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of John Curran
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 11:08 AM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] About needs basis in 8.3 transfers
On Jun 12, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Owen DeLong
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Changing the definition of bad actors can, indeed, make a bunch of bad actors
now fit the reformed definition of “good companies”, but similarly, repealing
laws against bank robbers would then make bank robbers no longer defined as
criminals.
Owen -
Let's save use of the term "criminal" for those actually violating public laws;
the phrase
"bad actors" applies quite well to those who violate community expectations,
whether
that be address policy, handling unsolicited bulk emailers, route
deaggregators, etc.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
