On Dec 18, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Steven Ryerse <[email protected]> wrote: > > Maybe a majority of the vocal community does, but I doubt if you add in all > members of the community who do not comment and all the members of the > community that only hold legacy allocations, I suspect that might not be the > case. I think the legacy community is speaking volumes by not participating > by commenting in this forum.
Steven - Given that anyone can participate in the discussion (i.e. there is no requirement to have any agreement with ARIN or be an ARIN member) and further that it would only take a couple of dozen additional participants to materially affect the outcome of the policy development process, one can only surmise that perceived need for policy change is relatively small compared to the effort to participate. We've done quite a bit to reduce the overhead of participating (e.g. remote participation options), but it is still incumbent up to those who perceive the need for policy changes to to participate in the process. Note that if even a fraction of a percent of the legacy address holders felt it necessary to become involved for a particular policy change, then it would happen. /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
