Conversely, why is it OK for an American organization to impose policies
controlling how a company does business in another part of the world?
David's argument and problem make sense to me. Affected orgs will just work
around the ARIN rules, like they always have...
-Adam
On May 26, 2015 3:24:19 PM CDT, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 5/26/15 12:57, David Huberman wrote:
>> There is no BGP in China without IP addresses registered in CNNIC.
>It's against the law. We, and many other ARIN-region operators, have
>networks to build and run in China. We cannot do so with the 24 month
>anti-flip rule in place.
>
>
>Why is another region's policy problem or restrictions something that
>needs fixing through ARIN policy?
>
>~Seth
>_______________________________________________
>PPML
>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
