David, I believe that examples definitely help. Can you confirm these scenario's as you see it.
1) XYZ Company (Australia) can go to the market in the ARIN region and perform a 8.4 transfer. As the company is based in the APNIC region and is not a ARIN customer they are not restricted by the "in region" requirements. 2) XYZ Company (America) wishing to perform an 8.4 transfer to XYZ Company (Australia) would be limited based on the source entity being "in region". Thanks, Kevin Blumberg -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Huberman Sent: May 26, 2015 4:30 PM To: Seth Mattinen; [email protected] Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2015-2: Modify 8.4 (Inter-RIR Transfers to Specified Recipients) > Why is another region's policy problem or restrictions something that > needs fixing through ARIN policy? Two answers: Because ARIN-region networks, subject to ARIN's NRPM, need to be able to move IP addresses out of region where and when they're needed. AND Because ARIN policy currently prohibits staff from counting out-of-region use as part of justification for a request. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
