On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:40 PM Joe Maimon <[email protected]> wrote: > Delegating > ARIN's role to LIR's absent technical needs would have to be on the > basis that it somehow improves IPv4 stewardship in a manner more > efficient and in-line with community goals and consensus. I think that > would be a high bar to meet.
Huh. Now there's an idea. What if LIRs were required to refer the approval process for blocks of 256 or more addresses to ARIN? Grandfather for existing delegations but make it so the maximum size block a LIR could independently approve is a /25. Then if the end user, having met ARIN's burden, wanted to lease instead of buy then so be it? Strictly spitballing here. I don't know that I'd support such a proposal but I want to throw it out there for discussion. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
