It also violates the "named"(Fixed) user license.
Fixed users are defined as a single account used by one person only.
 
You can use read only access with submitter mode locked to allow people
to Submit and Modify records that they submitted.
Read Restricted accounts can submit but even in submitter locked mode
cannot modify records.
 
Your best bet is to change your design, use read restricted access an
make everything a submit. Your modified entries would be child entries
of the original parent record. As long as you don't use workflow and a
fixed account to automatically update the children into the parent
record you are not violating any license agreements.
 

John J. Reiser
Software Development Analyst
Remedy Administrator/Developer
Lockheed Martin - MS2
The star that burns twice as bright burns half as long.
Pay close attention and be illuminated by its brilliance. - paraphrased
by me



 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L. J. Head
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 11:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: License Usage


** 
My understanding is that it would be a violation based on the 'no group
user accounts' policy...I've never read the agreement myself but
understand it as such.

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Caruso
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: License Usage


** Looking for feedback on whether the following set up would violate a
license agreement with BMC:

Putting up web sites (not MidTier) where end users can submit and update
records but the web site authenticates with the ARS server using one ID.

This ID has been granted a Fixed license and each site will have a
unique Remedy ID attached to it. Also, it is possible that many of the
users submitting and updating tickets through these web sites will have
a Remedy login with a Floating license, however, the web sites will not
use that ID to authenticate. 

I believe that this would be a violation but cannot find anything
written from BMC that states it would.

Thank you




__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to