I would also agree that it has been a longstanding license violation. Since the early days of 4.x at least, the 'read' license was limited to submission of new records and querying, and modification of records required a change license. When RemedyWeb came out it was possible to make updates to the display only Web form that would trigger a filter that would make background database updates by the Web user, but doing such an update was specifically not permitted due to the clause above. Any other method, including a single user being used by multiple workstations, is also such a licensing violation.
Louise van Hine
KTSL Limited

Quoting "L. J. Head" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

**      My understanding is that it would be a violation based on the
'no group user accounts' policy...I've never read the agreement
myself but understand it as such.
-------------------------
 FROM: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ON BEHALF OF Frank Caruso
SENT: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:58 AM
TO: [email protected]
SUBJECT: License Usage

 ** Looking for feedback on whether the following set up would
violate a license agreement with BMC:
Putting up web sites (not MidTier) where end users can submit and
update records but the web site authenticates with the ARS server
using one ID. This ID has been granted a Fixed license and each site will have a
unique Remedy ID attached to it. Also, it is possible that many of
the users submitting and updating tickets through these web sites
will have a Remedy login with a Floating license, however, the web
sites will not use that ID to authenticate. I believe that this would be a violation but cannot find anything written from BMC that states it would. Thank you

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in it___  __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted
with HTML in it___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"

Reply via email to