Fred,

 

Permissions for Request ID on both forms: 

 

Assignee

Public

Submitter

 

-L

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 11:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: WSDL Permission Problem?

 

What are the permissions on your Entry_ID (Request ID) field on Form B?

 

Fred

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lars Christianson
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 10:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: WSDL Permission Problem?

 

** 

Hi folks,

 

I have a question for you. I'm running ARServer 7.1, Mid-Tier 7.1; both
Solaris 10. 

 

When I create a new ticket in two different forms using SOAP, I get a
ticket number back for the first form but not for the second form. In
both cases, a ticket is created inside Remedy.

 

For example: 

 

The return response on Form A

 

<soapenv:Envelope
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>

   <soapenv:Body>

      <ns0:OpCreateResponse xmlns:ns0="urn:Test_TestWSDL">

         <ns0:Request_ID>000000000000015</ns0:Request_ID>

      </ns0:OpCreateResponse>

   </soapenv:Body>

</soapenv:Envelope>

 

The return response on Form B

 

<soapenv:Envelope
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>

   <soapenv:Body>

      <soapenv:Fault>

         <faultcode>soapenv:Server.userException</faultcode>

         <faultstring>ERROR (302): Entry does not exist in
database;</faultstring>

         <detail>

            <ns1:hostname
xmlns:ns1="http://xml.apache.org/axis/";>nc4</ns1:hostname>

         </detail>

      </soapenv:Fault>

   </soapenv:Body>

</soapenv:Envelope>

 

I thought this issue was related to row-level permissions based on
"Assignee Group" Field 112, but this field is included in both forms and
is visible to "Public".  

 

Has anyone else come across this issue before? Any advice would be
welcome.

 

Thanks in advance,

 

-Lars

 

 

_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to