Joe,

 

*       ARS 7.1 Solaris 10
*       Mid-Tier 7.1 Solaris 10

 

The user tool doesn't exhibit this error. Even with the SOAP error, the
ticket is created inside Remedy properly. Instead of the ticket number
being returned in the SOAP response, I get that error message.

 

I checked the H table for that form, and it is being populated with the
proper entry ID. 

 

I've turned on logging for both the arapi and arsql. There are no errors
in the SQL processing. There is an error in the API which tells me what
I already know:

 

*/+XMLCE  ARXMLCreateEntry from Webservice (protocol 13) at IP address
172.25.7.23

/* Tue Jan 12 2010 11:27:25.6947 */        ARXMLCreateEntry -- schema
VT:VirtualTechnicianForm from Webservice (protocol 13) at IP address
172.25.7.23

/* Tue Jan 12 2010 11:27:25.7866 */-XMLCE            FAIL

 

 It's as if the SOAP response is being returned before the ticket is
finished being created. 

 

 

I do have a theory. This form pushes information into other forms. Would
I need Field 1 and 112 access on those other forms as well as the main
form that interacts with the XML service?

 

Thanks again for giving me further areas to look into.

 

-Lars

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 11:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: WSDL Permission Problem?

 

Lars,

 

What version of ARS are you on? Since you have already eliminated the
permissions to Field 1 and Field 112 I'd like you to check the
following..

 

Do you get the same error from the user tool?

 

If so, AND if you are below ARS 7.5, check your Status History table (H
table in the database) to have a corresponding entry for that record. If
the corresponding record in the H table is missing, you can get that
error below ARS 7.5. ARS 7.5 is the first version since I have known ARS
that does not require the Status History table to be populated. Anything
below and if the H table has its corresponding missing contents, you
will get that error.

 

Hope this helps...

 

Cheers

 

Joe

        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lars Christianson
        Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 10:53 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: WSDL Permission Problem?

         

        ** 

        Hi folks,

         

        I have a question for you. I'm running ARServer 7.1, Mid-Tier
7.1; both Solaris 10. 

         

        When I create a new ticket in two different forms using SOAP, I
get a ticket number back for the first form but not for the second form.
In both cases, a ticket is created inside Remedy.

         

        For example: 

         

        The return response on Form A

         

        <soapenv:Envelope
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>

           <soapenv:Body>

              <ns0:OpCreateResponse xmlns:ns0="urn:Test_TestWSDL">

                 <ns0:Request_ID>000000000000015</ns0:Request_ID>

              </ns0:OpCreateResponse>

           </soapenv:Body>

        </soapenv:Envelope>

         

        The return response on Form B

         

        <soapenv:Envelope
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>

           <soapenv:Body>

              <soapenv:Fault>

                 <faultcode>soapenv:Server.userException</faultcode>

                 <faultstring>ERROR (302): Entry does not exist in
database;</faultstring>

                 <detail>

                    <ns1:hostname
xmlns:ns1="http://xml.apache.org/axis/";>nc4</ns1:hostname>

                 </detail>

              </soapenv:Fault>

           </soapenv:Body>

        </soapenv:Envelope>

         

        I thought this issue was related to row-level permissions based
on "Assignee Group" Field 112, but this field is included in both forms
and is visible to "Public".  

         

        Has anyone else come across this issue before? Any advice would
be welcome.

         

        Thanks in advance,

         

        -Lars

_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to