Oh, Lord, so do I!!!  I still use pieces of it to process incoming replies.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing & IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Tanner, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:44 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Email Issue

**
Oh how I miss Rem-Mail
Doug

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Tommy Morris
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:21 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Email Issue

**
No this is not on VM. It's a physical box and I can duplicate it from my Dev, 
QA and Prod environments by simply turning on the email service. Then I start 
getting timesync errors in my system log. BMC told me to get SUN to help 
troubleshoot. I didn't know whether I should scream or laugh at that.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:34 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Email Issue

** Is this a VM?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Tommy Morris 
<tommy.mor...@radioshack.com<mailto:tommy.mor...@radioshack.com>> wrote:
**
On our Window 2003 servers which run the email service the time gets 
continuously ahead until our timesync service can no longer correct the time. 
This ONLY happens with the email service turned on. BMC says that it is an OS 
issue or a java issue even though we have the same java and OS on other boxes 
and there are no issues on anything but the box which runs the email service. 
Of course it can't be a java-hogging AR Email service that is causing the issue.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 9:53 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Re: Email Issue

**
You won't like the answer, but our 7.1.00.002 server has experienced random 
hangs of the MAPI email system since it went live in May 2008, with an Incident 
opened in June 2008 that was NEVER RESOLVED.  Also on Windows 2003 x64, with 
Outlook 2007 SP1 connecting to Exchange 2007, with archiving set up to keep the 
number of sent emails in Exchange down to a month's worth (25,000 to 40,000 
messages).  A nightly escalation moves all Sent mail to an archive folder, so 
there is never more than one day's mail in the Messages form.  Outgoing and 
incoming mail interval is 3 minutes, which usually keeps the queue below 60 
messages at any given interval.

Over the years since this system went live, support has shipped me everything 
they could think of in the way of modified or instrumented email engines (up to 
7.1.00.004), and nothing that they came up with prevented the three types of 
errors:
1. The aremaild.exe process hangs at over 1200 handles with no errors generated 
in messages or logs of any kind (normal is 700 to 800 handles idle, 1000 to 
1300 while processing)
2. A java error appears in the Event Log and the service is hung
3. A error is logged in an hs_err_pid####.log file in the \Office12 folder, and 
the service is hung

In most cases the Windows service is hung and cannot be manually stopped in a 
normal fashion - it will stop eventually, but issues a message about not 
responding. Rarely, you might have to kill the actual process from the Task 
Manager. Also rarely, the service is still running but MAPI processing has 
stopped (our patch 4 build writes a mapi.log continuously) and you can restart 
the service more or less normally (does not hang while trying to stop).

I have had problems with the AREmail engine on Windows with MAPI ever since 
they switched it to java, it's just dramatically worse in 7.1.  We just live 
with it, keeping a query open in a User Tool 24 hours a day where we can see it 
for Email messages where Send = Yes, refreshing every 5 minutes, and when the 
screen fills (= over 100 messages) we restart the service.  A schedule task 
runs a batch job three times a day, 5:45 AM, PM, and 11:45 PM that does a net 
stop and a net start of the service.  I disabled a fourth one at 11:45 AM 
because whenever it fired with a lot of messages in the from waiting to go out, 
it often hung within the next 15 minutes.

During testing with ARS 7.5 on Windows 2008 R2 we saw even worse problems with 
MAPI - the service would not process mail unless you had a console open, logged 
in under the account that ran the email service, and you had started the 
service from there!!  We plan to use SMTP and POP for 7.6.0x; it seems to work 
reliably enough, but then so did 7.1 MAPI back in 2008, until it was put under 
a normal production load.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing & IT Center
http://itsm.unt.edu/
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the Answers 
Are"_

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

DISCLAIMER Important! This message is intended for the above named person(s) 
only and is CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this e-mail and have received it in error, please immediately notify the 
sender by return email and then delete it from your mailbox. This message may 
be protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine. 
Accessing, copying, disseminating or re-using any of the information contained 
in this e-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly 
prohibited. Finally, you should check this email and any attachments for the 
presence of viruses, as the sender accepts no liability for any damage caused 
by any virus transmitted by this email. Thank you.
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to