I can't disagree, but this line went from black/white to gray at least 5 years 
ago.

Now I regularly get messages on Twitter/Facebook involving more stuff related 
to work than personal stuff - and in the average week I don't log on to either 
of those.

I suspect FB will be blocked at fewer and fewer companies (at least in the 
marketing department) and be more and more open as people realize the amount of 
evangelizing a large employee base can do, as well as mitigate customer horror 
stories. 

You may or may not be surprised how many FB accounts - especially those of 
attractive women - are of course fake and are the "face(s)" of either a large 
number of company reps and/or marketing people incognito saying just how much 
the latest Acme widget has made them rich, thin, and gotten the crabgrass out 
of their lawn.


William Rentfrow
Principal Consultant, StrataCom Inc.
[email protected]
Blog: www.williamrentfrow.com
O 715-592-5185
C 715-410-8056

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sanford, Claire
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: OT - RE- RFE (No Plans to Implement)

Please no Facebook!  I am so sick and tired of companies that have their own 
functioning web site using Facebook as a way of communicating with their 
customers.  My main reason is that FB is blocked here at work.  My other reason 
is that FB should be social, not business.  I do not mix business activities 
with social ones on the internet.  Hell... I don't even use my own name for 
social activities! 

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 9:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement)

I can see using BMCDN polls for this.

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shellman, David
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement)

**
John,

I agree with that. It's pretty easy to build surveys within the AR System. Your 
product makes it even easier.

It also doesn't make sense to use Face Book. It's easier to use the BMC 
Community portal. 
Dave
-------------------------
[email protected]
(Wireless)
 
-----Original Message-----
From: John Sundberg [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 05:56 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement) 
 
hmmmmmmm

-----Original Message-----
On Apr 28, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Susan Palmer wrote:

** I predict a Kinetic Survey ad in our future  ..... :)

-----Original Message-----
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Andrew C Goodall <[email protected]> wrote:
David,

Here's some solutions for BMC may consider for having users vote.

1. Use a Survey tool http://www.surveymonkey.com

Use or develop a service yourself like http://www.surveymonkey.com

Surveymonkey is cheap and easy to use versus the cost of your own custom 
solution, although BMC may disagree :)

Put every RFE into surveymonkey and broadcast email to subscribers of the 
product for voting.

2. Use Facebook - create pages for every BMC product that customers could join 
to like (good for you and marketing) and then create facebook poll questions 
when an RFE is created to get friends (customers) feedback.

Note: before posting RFE for voting I would also create a process to verify 
with the originating requestor and R&D that the description of the enhancement 
is clear and makes sense for the wider audience.


Regards,

Andrew Goodall
Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . www.jcp.com  |  
972.431.1518

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew C Goodall
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:30 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: RFE (No Plans to Implement)

I agree, I think that is a great idea. The RFE process needs to be opened up 
and voted on by paying customers to gauge the real world demand for such 
enhancements to products.

I've opened tons of RFEs and rarely do I hear back on any of them, never to my 
knowledge has a single one been acted on.
They go into no where land.


Regards,

Andrew Goodall
Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . www.jcp.com 
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement)

Hi David,

How does BMC determines the demand for an RFE? Are you relying on BMC 
consulting services or the sales department to gauge and estimate the demand?
It seems to me the proper way would be to open the process by having willing 
customers participating and voting in the process. No offense, but most sales 
guys (not just BMC, let's be clear on this) only deal with management and they 
don't really know what users (technical and business users) want.

Guillaume


________________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [[email protected]] on 
behalf of Easter, David [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement)

The phrasing is, admittedly, a little confusing - but the general message being 
conveyed is that the RFE was put in several releases ago and the RFE has been 
considered but deferred several times.  If an RFE is considered and deferred 
multiple times, it is an indication that the enhancement request isn't going to 
be of high enough demand or priority to justify implementation.  Rather than 
just leave the RFE in a nebulous state, BMC feels it appropriate to be honest 
with customers and just close the RFE with "No plans to implement" - because 
there are no plans to implement it.

-David J. Easter
Manager of Product Management, Remedy Platform BMC Software, Inc.

The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this 
E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My voluntary 
participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, 
liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terje Moglestue
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 02:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement)

It sounds like - if you wait long enough -  you can close the ticket!

Or - they think it is just like cheese - it's getter better with time - until 
it is out of date!

~
Terje

________________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng [[email protected]]
Sent: 27 April 2011 19:40
To: [email protected]
Subject: RFE (No Plans to Implement)

This one is a new one....

"Our RFE Review Committee has re-reviewed this RFE and, unfortunately, decided 
to reject this RFE due to the fact the version this RFE was filed on is no 
longer supported."


--
J
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 
www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to