I can't help but think we should keep social apps separate from work apps. Its not like emails where we might have one email for work and the other for personal items.
There are plenty of other ways to gather data an opinions and I believe it should start at the BMC website. Kind regards Danny Sent from my iPhone On 29 Apr 2011, at 18:35, William Rentfrow <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't disagree, but this line went from black/white to gray at least 5 > years ago. > > Now I regularly get messages on Twitter/Facebook involving more stuff related > to work than personal stuff - and in the average week I don't log on to > either of those. > > I suspect FB will be blocked at fewer and fewer companies (at least in the > marketing department) and be more and more open as people realize the amount > of evangelizing a large employee base can do, as well as mitigate customer > horror stories. > > You may or may not be surprised how many FB accounts - especially those of > attractive women - are of course fake and are the "face(s)" of either a large > number of company reps and/or marketing people incognito saying just how much > the latest Acme widget has made them rich, thin, and gotten the crabgrass out > of their lawn. > > > William Rentfrow > Principal Consultant, StrataCom Inc. > [email protected] > Blog: www.williamrentfrow.com > O 715-592-5185 > C 715-410-8056 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sanford, Claire > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: OT - RE- RFE (No Plans to Implement) > > Please no Facebook! I am so sick and tired of companies that have their own > functioning web site using Facebook as a way of communicating with their > customers. My main reason is that FB is blocked here at work. My other > reason is that FB should be social, not business. I do not mix business > activities with social ones on the internet. Hell... I don't even use my own > name for social activities! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 9:49 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement) > > I can see using BMCDN polls for this. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shellman, David > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 5:36 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement) > > ** > John, > > I agree with that. It's pretty easy to build surveys within the AR System. > Your product makes it even easier. > > It also doesn't make sense to use Face Book. It's easier to use the BMC > Community portal. > Dave > ------------------------- > [email protected] > (Wireless) > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Sundberg [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 05:56 PM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement) > > hmmmmmmm > > -----Original Message----- > On Apr 28, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Susan Palmer wrote: > > ** I predict a Kinetic Survey ad in our future ..... :) > > -----Original Message----- > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Andrew C Goodall <[email protected]> wrote: > David, > > Here's some solutions for BMC may consider for having users vote. > > 1. Use a Survey tool http://www.surveymonkey.com > > Use or develop a service yourself like http://www.surveymonkey.com > > Surveymonkey is cheap and easy to use versus the cost of your own custom > solution, although BMC may disagree :) > > Put every RFE into surveymonkey and broadcast email to subscribers of the > product for voting. > > 2. Use Facebook - create pages for every BMC product that customers could > join to like (good for you and marketing) and then create facebook poll > questions when an RFE is created to get friends (customers) feedback. > > Note: before posting RFE for voting I would also create a process to verify > with the originating requestor and R&D that the description of the > enhancement is clear and makes sense for the wider audience. > > > Regards, > > Andrew Goodall > Software Engineer 2 | Development Services | jcpenney . www.jcp.com | > 972.431.1518 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew C Goodall > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:30 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: RFE (No Plans to Implement) > > I agree, I think that is a great idea. The RFE process needs to be opened up > and voted on by paying customers to gauge the real world demand for such > enhancements to products. > > I've opened tons of RFEs and rarely do I hear back on any of them, never to > my knowledge has a single one been acted on. > They go into no where land. > > > Regards, > > Andrew Goodall > Software Engineer 2 | Development Services | jcpenney . www.jcp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement) > > Hi David, > > How does BMC determines the demand for an RFE? Are you relying on BMC > consulting services or the sales department to gauge and estimate the demand? > It seems to me the proper way would be to open the process by having willing > customers participating and voting in the process. No offense, but most sales > guys (not just BMC, let's be clear on this) only deal with management and > they don't really know what users (technical and business users) want. > > Guillaume > > > ________________________________________ > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [[email protected]] on > behalf of Easter, David [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:57 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement) > > The phrasing is, admittedly, a little confusing - but the general message > being conveyed is that the RFE was put in several releases ago and the RFE > has been considered but deferred several times. If an RFE is considered and > deferred multiple times, it is an indication that the enhancement request > isn't going to be of high enough demand or priority to justify > implementation. Rather than just leave the RFE in a nebulous state, BMC > feels it appropriate to be honest with customers and just close the RFE with > "No plans to implement" - because there are no plans to implement it. > > -David J. Easter > Manager of Product Management, Remedy Platform BMC Software, Inc. > > The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in > this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My > voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a > spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, > Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terje Moglestue > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 02:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: RFE (No Plans to Implement) > > It sounds like - if you wait long enough - you can close the ticket! > > Or - they think it is just like cheese - it's getter better with time - until > it is out of date! > > ~ > Terje > > ________________________________________ > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng [[email protected]] > Sent: 27 April 2011 19:40 > To: [email protected] > Subject: RFE (No Plans to Implement) > > This one is a new one.... > > "Our RFE Review Committee has re-reviewed this RFE and, unfortunately, > decided to reject this RFE due to the fact the version this RFE was filed on > is no longer supported." > > > -- > J > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 > www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
