Mark,

 

Groups work fine.  It's user names that are not going through.

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brittain, Mark
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 5:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Using login id in field 112

 

** 

I am using ARS 6.3 and have multiple groups in field 112. In my case the
groups I am using are one word groups such as Group1 Group2

 

I don't have quotes or semi-colons in between. Just a space and it works
fine. Not sure how that might work with multi-names like Help Desk but
thought I would pass this along.

 

Mark

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Pancia
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Using login id in field 112

 

** Tried droping the quotes and semicolons at the beginning and end.  Also,
tried using field 6090 and 112.  Neither work.  This might be a bug in
7.6.04.  The documentation says it's support, but it looks like I might have
to go the individual group route.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Frank Caruso <[email protected]>
wrote:

** 

I tested the following in version 7.1p7:

 

Set Field ID 112 to: 'user login';'user login';'user login'

 

Set request ID to Assigned Group permission only. Only users whose userid
appears in field id 112 can see the record.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Misi Mladoniczky <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Axton,

I tried this with the 112 field when the 60xxx fields was first
introduced, but was unable to get it to work for 112... Maybe I made a
mistake, or this was added/fixed later...

       Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://rrr.se <http://rrr.se/> 


>>From the docs it appears both field types support login names, group
>> names,
> and role names:
>
> *To permit multiple user, group, and role names in the Assignee Group
> field
> and dynamic fields, select Enable Multiple Assign Groups on the
> Configuration tab of AR System Administration: Server Information form. To
> enter users Dan O'Connor and Mary Manager, group ID 12000, role ID -9000,
> and role Managers, use the following syntax:*
> *
> *
> *'Dan O''Connor';'Mary Manager';12000;-9000;Managers*
>
>
> Axton Grams
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Misi Mladoniczky <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I do not think that the 112-field can hold user names. You have to use
>> the
>> 60xxx-fields for that. If you use those fields, your syntax should be
>> correct.
>>
>> Just to be clear, the value of the data should be:
>> ;'joeuser';'janeuser';
>>
>>        Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se
<http://www.rrr.se/>  (ARSList MVP 2011)
>>
>> Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11):
>> * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
>> * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy
>> logs.
>> Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at
>> http://rrr.se <http://rrr.se/> .
>>
>> > We are currently trying to setup ITSM 7.6.04 to restrict access based
>> on
>> a
>> > selected group of people.  This group will be different for each
>> ticket.
>> > Basically, the user will go into an Incident and select people to add
>> to
>> a
>> > restricted access list.  We are trying to push this list of users to
>> field
>> > 112.  The BMC workflow documentation spells out the syntax
>> > (";'joeuser';'janeuser';").  However, this throws out Error 417
>> stating
>> > there is no group defined.  Now a way around this is to add each user
>> as
>> > their own group.  However, adding groups for each user and maintaining
>> > that
>> > as people are added/removed would probably not be the best idea.  Has
>> > anyone
>> > had any success implementing this in 7.6.04?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Brian
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
____________________________________________________________________________
___
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
<http://www.arslist.org/> 
>> > attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com <http://www.wwrug.com/>  ARSList: "Where
the Answers Are"
>> >
>>
>>
>>
____________________________________________________________________________
___
>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
<http://www.arslist.org/> 
>> attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com <http://www.wwrug.com/>  ARSList: "Where the
Answers Are"
>>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
<http://www.arslist.org/> 
> attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com <http://www.wwrug.com/>  ARSList: "Where the
Answers Are"
>

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
<http://www.arslist.org/> 
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com <http://www.wwrug.com/>  ARSList: "Where the
Answers Are"

 

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com <http://www.wwrug.com/>  ARSlist: "Where the
Answers Are"_ 


_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 

 

  _____  

This e-mail is the property of NaviSite, Inc. It is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that
is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
Distribution or copying of this e-mail, or the information contained herein,
to anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ 


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to