Or maybe folks are opting for less functionality with these types of systems - less bells and whistles - just do whats needed to get the job done. ----- Original Message ----- From: Joe D'Souza Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 1:08 PM Subject: Re: ServiceNow as SRM replacement?
** Like this person said - cost of the product itself. Sometimes a short term vision for short term gains can lead to long term losses. Then again it could be lack of funding itself. With the economy that is perhaps barely recovering, I would think that is more of a reason than a lack of vision of long term losses. They just take that chance of shooting themselves in the foot and then see how far you can run J. Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lisa Kemes Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 8:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ServiceNow as SRM replacement? ** Why do people feel the need to switch to Service Now to begin with? Just curious..... Lisa Kemes On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Tauf Chowdhury <[email protected]> wrote: All, A little birdie was chirping the other day and I heard something about SNow having an integration or some type of implementation scenario where it is taking the place of SRM But still have AR and ITSM on the fulfillment side. I'm sure it's possible but my question to you folks is: 1. Have you done it 2. If so, what gives? How'd it go? I understand the drawbacks so we don't have to go there but feel free if you'd like :) Sent from my iPhone _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
