Hi, We originally had a single server stage/test system and a two node server 
group for production, running 7.6.03. In order to upgrade to 8.1.0, we have 
built a whole new phyiscal and virtual environment on which we do a DB restore 
from prod and upgrade to 8.1.0. In conjunction with that, we are running the 
Delta Data Migration tool to keep things inline. We've been at this for some 
months now but hopefully the end is now in sight, but we keep finding new 
things that need fixing. Regards -Mike Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:38:10 
-0800From: jason.milja2@GMAIL.COMSubject: Re: Upgrade from 7.6.4 to 8.1To: 
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG**
We are upgrading the existing servers.  The staging server sounds like more 
work that it is worth in our situation this time around.  Since this 
environment is not fully in production with all processes (we still have IM, 
PM, AM, KM left to implement here) we will be able to take a 2 day down time (I 
actually have the process down to about 24 hours worth of work now but we need 
some buffer).  I don't expect we'll have the luxury in future upgrades.
JasonOn Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Simon Ellis <simon.el...@telecom.co.nz> 
wrote:
**
Be interested to know what methodology you guys are using to perform your 
upgrades.  Are you using a staging server or upgrading in situe…
 
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of patchsk
Sent: Saturday, 11 January 2014 7:22 p.m.To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORGSubject: Re: 
Upgrade from 7.6.4 to 8.1
 ** Same here. We actually finished our QA and about to start UAT on our 
upgrade from version 8.0 to 8.1p002.
Found a few timezone related issues which we are working with BMC to 
resolve.Our users are global with some areas of the application using site 
local times.
For us timezone is very important, other than that  we did not see any 
stability issues so far.Our current production version 8.0 was also very 
stable. It has been in production for more than an year.
We are on linux6.x and Oracle11. So far seems to be stable.On Friday, January 
10, 2014 2:26:09 PM UTC-8, Jason Miller wrote:** 
That is interesting.  My understanding and from what I have seen 8.1 has been 
very solid.  We are upgrading from 8.0 to 8.1 next month so we'll find out 
(although still only using SRM, WO and CM at this time).
 Jason On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Jim Coryat (jcoryat) 
<jco...@micron.com> wrote:
** Kathy,Was there a reason you are electing to go to version 8.1?  We have 
found that 8.1 was not a very good release of Remedy for BMC.  We have 
encountered various defects that have caused stability issues with the 
arserver.exe process.  We also encountered issues with the mid-tier and the use 
of a reverse proxy as well as iE 10 incompatibility.  In contrast, 8.0 was much 
more stable in our experience.  If you still intend on 8.1, be sure you get the 
latest patch applied and read everything there is to know about that release. 
 Jim Coryatx34655
 From: Gadgil, Abhijeet [mailto:abhijee...@bmc.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 7:55 AMSubject: Re: Upgrade from 7.6.4 to 8.1 
** Pl go through webinar below as a 
start:https://communities.bmc.com/community/bmcdn/bmc_it_service_support/blog/2013/08/07/upgrading-to-bmc-remedy-81-things-that-you-really-need-to-know
 Abhijeet
The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this 
E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  
  
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:...@ARSLIST.ORG] 
On Behalf Of Kathy Morris
Sent: 08 January 2014 22:22To: ars...@ARSLIST.ORGSubject: Upgrade from 7.6.4 to 
8.1 
** Hi, 
We are planning the upgrade from 7.6.4 to 8.1.  Wondering what others have 
experienced with a 7.6.4 to 8x upgrade.  Our company feels this upgrade is 
going to be “very difficult.” We have never archived any data.  There were over 
100 hotfixes applied to 7.6.4.  Besides the release notes, is there any 
documentation to help with this painful process J Are there any gotchas? 
Recommendations?
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years__ARSlist: "Where 
the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ 
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_  
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist: "Where 
the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_                   
                  
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to