Charlie, Being an AR System admin is not about how many active links or filters or fields one can put together in a day. Do they work as intended? Are the permissions right? If they are not working as intended how well does the individual do to figure out what is not right and correct the problem. Is it entirely new workflow or is the individual adding to something another person put together? Or they finding and correcting issues and with existing workflow.
If you count workflow objects one could do coding to meet that criteria. On the other had they could be efficient and combine three actions into one filter instead of three. Finally there is more than one way to create code within the AR System. One individual could do something one way and another individual completely different. Both ways meet the design requirements. Dave > On Jun 3, 2014, at 5:46 PM, "Charlie Lotridge" <[email protected]> wrote: > > ** > Hi all, > > I'm curious...what are your opinions about what might be useful metrics to > use to judge the performance of Remedy developers? To narrow the > conversation a bit, let's just talk about during the creation of a new custom > application, or custom module to an existing application. In other words for > code generation. > > So for example, you might tell me that a good developer can create at least > 50 logic objects (active links/filters/escalations) in a day. Or create & > format one form/day. > > What are you opinions? > > Thanks, > Charlie > _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
