Dave, Ok, fair enough. And I agree there are a lot of qualifications/considerations.
I'm seeing now, though, that I posed too broad (and sensitive) a question. Let me try a different angle on this, which should be sufficient for my needs: On a good day, and if it's all you had to do, about how many workflow objects (AL's, filters, escalations) can you create (minimum, maximum, and average)? For me, if it's very complex workflow, it might be as low as 15-20 objects. On the other hand, if it's a highly mechanical operation - e.g. I need to replicate the same On Return active link that perhaps calls a common guide across all the fields of several forms, so I'm only changing the field id and doing a "Save As" - it might get up to a few hundred (say one/minute). But even on my worst day and the most complex workflow it's not going to be just one object on the low end, and it's never going to be a thousand on the high end. So for me, min to max, my answer would be 15 to, say, 400. And, on average, I'd say it's probably around 30 or so. So, anyone willing to answer, I'd appreciate the data points. Thanks, Charlie On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Shellman, David <dave.shell...@te.com> wrote: > Charlie, > > Being an AR System admin is not about how many active links or filters or > fields one can put together in a day. Do they work as intended? Are the > permissions right? If they are not working as intended how well does the > individual do to figure out what is not right and correct the problem. Is > it entirely new workflow or is the individual adding to something another > person put together? Or they finding and correcting issues and with > existing workflow. > > If you count workflow objects one could do coding to meet that criteria. > On the other had they could be efficient and combine three actions into one > filter instead of three. > > Finally there is more than one way to create code within the AR System. > One individual could do something one way and another individual > completely different. Both ways meet the design requirements. > > Dave > > > On Jun 3, 2014, at 5:46 PM, "Charlie Lotridge" <lotri...@mcs-sf.com> > wrote: > > > > ** > > Hi all, > > > > I'm curious...what are your opinions about what might be useful metrics > to use to judge the performance of Remedy developers? To narrow the > conversation a bit, let's just talk about during the creation of a new > custom application, or custom module to an existing application. In other > words for code generation. > > > > So for example, you might tell me that a good developer can create at > least 50 logic objects (active links/filters/escalations) in a day. Or > create & format one form/day. > > > > What are you opinions? > > > > Thanks, > > Charlie > > _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
