Re DAC clock: presumably, the plan is to distribute a 10MHz (or 100MHz, or 
whatever) clock with really low close-in phase noise to each MCH, and then from 
each MCH to the AMCs via the backplane. Why not send this from the AMC to the 
FMC boards via the FMC connectors? Then, have the FMC board generate the DAC 
clock using an integer-N PLL. If done properly, an int-N PLL at a couple of GHz 
is cheap, has a small footprint and will give as good phase noise/phase 
stability as using an external synth plus coax. The loop filter bandwidth can 
be low enough to take out any cross-talk from the FMC/backplane. Plus, this way 
the DAC clock has a well-defined phase relationship to the main system clock 
(the 10MHz or whatever), which may come in handy for keeping everything 
synchronised...
Basically, it is not possible to generate a sufficiently high performance DAC 
clock for many applications from something that comes over the backplane, due 
to crosstalk/signal integrity issues.  Joe Britton has some data on clock noise 
over uTCA backplanes, I believe.  The idea would be to have a clock selection 
crossbar switch on the FMC card, which allows the user either to use an 
external clock brought in on an SMA connector, or to use a clock generated by a 
PLL on the AMC card referenced to a backplane clock (and there will be 
backplane clocks for digital timing purposes).  This way people who really care 
about phase noise can have it as good as they want, while people who don't care 
as much can dispense with the extra wiring and clutter involved in feeding 
external clocks to each FMC module.  The issue is just that for the most 
demanding signal generation, using backplane clocks and an on-chip PLL is 
considerably worse than a dedicated clock that would come in on the front panel 
from a dedicated low-noise clock source.
Mike Biercuk, his student, and Will Oliver have made a nice writeup looking at 
the importance of low phase noise master clocks for gate fidelity, that 
describes a number of the important issues:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.04551
Best,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
ARTIQ mailing list
https://ssl.serverraum.org/lists/listinfo/artiq

Reply via email to