On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:30 AM, 'Marco Ciampa' via asciidoc < [email protected]> wrote:
> For an example I could have used asciidoctor instead of asciidoc more than > a year ago with the i18n in place. > > And I am sorry for this. > Can you describe what you think is currently missing in Asciidoctor when compared to AsciiDoc Py? Asciidoctor supports exactly the same i18n attributes. I want to make sure I'm not missing something. See http://asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#builtin-attributes -Dan -- Dan Allen | @mojavelinux | http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
