On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 08:15:20AM +0100, Tim Panton wrote:
> What's your objection to a softphone in java ?
That it still requires installation of a JVM on the client's system
(most browsers nowadays don't have it installed). And then again, it
required downloading the software to be used from the server, which is
not such a grand idea.
If Java were installed by default in the browser, it would be nice to
use such a phone. But as things stand now, a simple softphone is just as
good.
If the soft phone is well written, the provisioning problem is a
non-issue, as I have mentioned is other parts of the thread.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
