ted_b;225245 Wrote: 
> My $.02 is this...try a decent 75ohm coax cable vs a decent GLASS
> toslink cable (plastic toslink is the norm, but usually way too rolled
> off anytime I've heard it).  Although I'm going to a modded Transporter
> soon, my current setup is an SB3 (modded) to a Monarchy DIP Upsampler
> 48/96 to an Ack Dack.  Although the Ack only accepts coax, the Monarchy
> accepts either (assuming XLR is not in this debate).  In my personal
> situation the glass toslink from an Audiogon vendor captnstarstripe
> ($30) was better than the any coax I used (Stereovox coax from Monarchy
> to ACk was constant).  YMMV.
> 
> Oh, and the Monarchy DIP was quite good and a necessary piece of this
> setup.  I'm sending it back to Audio Advisor because it ultimately has
> no use in my Transporter setup, but bewteen the SB3 and a DAC it lifted
> a slight veil and seemed to focus the images like a camera focus ring.


Ted - when you say "rolled off" you don't mean lacking in high
frequencies do you? - coz it's kind of difiicult to imagine how the
digital cable can affect frequency response in that way...

I can't detect any difference using either coax or toslink out of my
SB3...


Anyway I use the Altmann gear for the same reason / benefits as the
Monarchy DIP (which I also used to have, but never used with an SB).


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...

...SB3+TACT+Altmann+MF DACXV3/Linn tri-amped Aktiv 5.1 system and some
very expensive cables ;o)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38188

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to