alekz;259846 Wrote: 
> Pablolie, do I understand correctly that you have:
> 
> 1. The original CD's
> 2. Ripped images
> 3. Mirror of your ripped images
> 4. Backup of the ripped images
> 5. Off-site remote backup of the ripped images
> 
> So you have quadruple redundancy. If I were you, I would scrap #5 and
> replace it with an external 1TB disk, you would keep "off-site", just
> in case, and synchronize every second week. 
> 
> #5 is simply not practical if works at all.

Indeed, I have
1. The original CDs, but truth is the whole point is to never have to
touch them again, even though for my favorites I eventually wouls like
a better album art cover and notes solution. One thing I miss is to
refresh my memory looking at the notes, going "ah, Eric Gale did guitar
on this Grover washington track, nice!" and such.

2. original rips
3. mirrored rips
4. backups

True in all cases, but there are error situations in which incremantal
data loss happens, and that experience scared me a lot. As stated, 2.
and 3. can run out of sunch and get corrupted; and 4 can miss data
you'd rather not lose. So you're left in an uncomfortable middle
gound.

5. I am curious to find out about my experience with (5) - I will
report. I'd rather do it now with my core collection, better safe than
sorry!


-- 
pablolie
------------------------------------------------------------------------
pablolie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3816
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=42358

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to