Themis wrote: > I was talking about the METHOD which is lossless. Is there > any theory saying that a non-transforming METHOD is lossy ? Can you > please enlighten me ?
Can you enlighten me on what you mean by "METHOD" here? Do you mean method acting? or something else. I'm not following any of this recent section of the thread. Analogue microphones (1) transform the signal and (2) are lossy. They are the first thing in the recording chain. If you want no transformations and nothing lossy, go to a recital. _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
