NewBuyer;553520 Wrote: 
> Based on what you've just said here Ron - using only analog outs and
> appreciating a more spacious volume - I recommend you get a
> Transporter.  I think it would produce a noticeable difference on the
> equipment you mention, and I also think you would enjoy this
> difference.  :)

For the difference in money and his equipment level, I don't know that
I could agree with that. I surely agree that the Transporter is better
and worth every penny in my system. But a Transporter being used with a
Receiver and Paradigm Speakers using RCA outs is an expensive source
component. If he was using separates and could use balanced outs, then
if he has money laying around that needs spent on audio equipment, then
sure.

So is the TP the best, in my opinion it is. Is it 'worth' doing in his
system, in my opinion no. I would rather see him spend money on better
amplification. Don't know what Onkyo receiver he has, but I would bet
it doesn't have enough current and headroom for the room he described.
It is rare that the source is the issue when sound is lacking in volume
or presence (unless we are talking about high end amps and speakers
already, and a crappy source), it is usually the amp and/or speakers
(read Receiver if one is being used).

Would a Touch be better then the Duet Receiver, by a little bit in his
system probably. The Transporter would obviously be better, but would
he hear $1500 better in his current system, hard to say. I lean toward
no, not really.

If he bought a TP, I would recommend buying a new amp (balanced inputs
is possible) and driving it with the TP.

An easy test would be to borrow an amp from a local shop to demo and
use the Duet Receiver to drive the amp using his current speakers. If
there is a huge improvement from doing this demo, then the Onkyo is the
issue not his source. My neighbor had a high end expensive receive and
was complaining that his listening room seemed 'vague'. So I took my
Adcom GFA-555 out of storage and ran his Duet Receiver directly into it
using his speakers. He now has separates in his listening room and moved
the Receiver to the living room.

Have I listened to RonM's system, I haven't. I can only think about
what it might be and what 'might' happen. But I do know one thing,
before I spent $2000 on a Transporter, I would make sure my speakers
and especially my amp/receiver were up to the task and not actually the
reason/problem (unless I'm looking for an excuse to buy both ;=} ) for
making me think I 'need' the Transporter.


-- 
iPhone

*iPhone*   
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's, VeraStarr
6.4SE 6-channel Amp, Vandersteen Speakers: Quatro Mains, VCC-5
Reference Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Video: Runco RS 900 CineWide
AutoScope 2.35:1   

Living Room:
Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A
Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1  

Kitchen: Squeezebox BOOM
Bedroom: Second Boom
Bathroom: Squeezebox Radio
Ford Thunderbird: Duet, Mac Mini
Ford Expedition: SB Touch, USB drive
------------------------------------------------------------------------
iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=79496

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to