your momo;598317 Wrote: 
> Having the NECESSITY of building up a wi-fi network to just control my
> audio system is none-sense ...having the POSSIBILITY to do it is
> however an asset.
> 
> Seriously wi-fi is not mature to control audio system in real usage,
> just changing one click on the volume after 10" of listening takes
> minimum 10s reaction time ...on the other end I agree there is a
> show-off effect being able to control the system form anywhere in a
> home.
> 
> Three years ago I would have voted for having all the server stuff in
> the player, on today I'm really happy that Transporter was build less
> of that. This is what makes it still today a great product with respect
> to competition. Computer stuff must stay away since it evolves much
> quicker than audio.

Funny, I run local SBServer on a HP EX490 Home Server, and controller
(Duet system) response is close to instantaneously. Hit the pause key
and the music stops within 1 sec, the same goes with next/prev and
volumen.


-- 
finnbrodersen

Some version of SBServer running on a HP EX490 home server
SBReceiver --> NAD C162+C272 --> DALI IKON 6 (let's call it MidFi)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
finnbrodersen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17360
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=84281

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to