jkeny wrote: > You mean how using a local clean clock in the USB receiving device to > time the USB signl is better than timing it with a derived clock running > in a computer powered by electrical noisy PS & sharing a an environment > bathed in emi & RFI? Why a stable clock would be better at timing than a > clock which is subjected to current fluctuations occuring from the > computer's moment-to-moment activity.
And how many currently available, commercial DACs actually have a totally independent clock? And how does the asynchronous ample rate converter that is included in most modern DACS change the situation? > Your second point is way off topic & as you say in your post title a > "deflection" but I can tell you that you don't state my position at all > accurately regarding ABX So how about explaining your actual position regarding ABX? "To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Julf's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42050 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
