Julf wrote: > Jkeny, I know you are the master of avoiding questions you don't like to > answer, but just to remind you, how about actually answering these? > > Hint: it is OK to reply with "I don't have a clue" You mean how using a local clean clock in the USB receiving device to time the USB signl is better than timing it with a derived clock running in a computer powered by electrical noisy PS & sharing a an environment bathed in emi & RFI? Why a stable clock would be better at timing than a clock which is subjected to current fluctuations occuring from the computer's moment-to-moment activity.
Your second point is way off topic & as you say in your post title a "deflection" but I can tell you that you don't state my position at all accurately regarding ABX ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jkeny's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35192 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
