Archimago wrote: > Will see man. :-) After all these years of soft, touchy-feely subjective > audiophile writers, I suspect objective guys will be a little too hot to > touch for the scam elements of the industry. > > -"Now let me welcome everybody to the wild, wild west > A state that's untouchable like Elliot Ness"- > > -- Tupac Shakur
I do so love it when a reviewer in TAS or Stereophile starts the review with a detailed explanation of the technical aspects of the equipment under review and then proceeds to go all voodoo and magic with respect to the sound quality, as if the two were completely unrelated. And of course in the case of MQA the two are completely unrelated since any careful review of the technical aspects of MQA would lead anyone with a firm grasp on the science of digital audio to conclude that MQA does absolutely nothing to enhance the audible sound quality. One the other hand, a nice "loan" of a $10,000 MQA enabled DAC might go a long in helping one to forget that conclusion. Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. & sub Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Energy sub Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0 Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar Garage: SB3-JVC compact system Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso Server: LMS 7.9 on dedicated windows 10 computer w/2 Drobos 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108132 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
