Hi, Bruno Cesar Ribas: > I'm not sure why you gave up on CVS. But maintain a sotfware under some > SCM is very important, there we might be able to cacth up all commits and > detailed changes, which makes easier to find some regression or even > identify a serious bug. > > I agree that CVS is not a very good option, but there are many SCM round the > world. And i think that GIT is a good options. If you desire we (c3sl) can > even host AUFS at git.c3sl.ufpr.br, and there are some free host to GIT > projects such as http://repo.or.cz/ .
As you wrote, I am switching from CVS to GIT locally. I have ever received "where is aufs files? I could not find anything on sourceforge." questions, and I thought people doesn't like the release method I took, eg. CVS on SF. I am still wondering where and how to manage new aufs2 source files. Currently I am choosing, - manage them on my local desktop (by GIT) - release them via the release system on SF And thank you for your offer. When the time has come, I will search the free public GIT server. Of course, you will be the first candidate. But I may try kernel.org. J. R. Okajima ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
