Have just read he "Report from Friedrichshafen" by Dave Nadler in the Sept issue of SSA Soaring.
 
There he says that Flarm is a not-for-profit organisation. I was not aware of that.
 
He also says that 450 Flarms were flying at end 2004 ..... with 2600 shipped since then (I assume this is to Countries he lists below).
 
Based on his advice that there are 1200 Gliders in Switzerland, 500 in Austria and 7000 in Germany and if the above assumption is correct, that means they have a take-up rate that may be as high as 35% in a comparatively short time.
 
But WE need to evaluate whether this is worthwhile.
 
I can understand that there is an issue re frequencies and Dave mentions that as an issue for the USA, as well as Product Liability Insurance for the US, ............ but does anyone really think that it needs a great deal of evaluation when the Europeans pilots and owners are voting with their wallets.
 
But I guess that someone will still argue, as they did recently on this forum, that Flarm shouldn't be adopted here because they will promote poor lookout practice ... and double negatives.
 
Save for the technical issues ............. LET'S GET ON WITH THEIR ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION HERE, and try to save a life or 2.
 
Is the GFA talking with the Insurers yet?
_______________________________________________
Aus-soaring mailing list
[email protected]
To check or change subscription details, visit:
http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring

Reply via email to