OK >I'm not sure you actually read my post. Either that or your reading >comprehension is extremely poor.
Mike Borgelt stated. >One study in the US was that medical conditions for powered aircraft pilots >were around 1% of accident causes. Fortunately they had a large body of >experience with glider and balloon pilots who self certify and the medical >rate of accident causes was 0.5% or so amongst them. Your point being that self reporting medical accident rate is 0.5% versus 1% for powered a/c pilots? >Same for the US glider and balloon pilots and both are based on a large number >of events so the stats, even if somewhat uncertain are likely pretty good. Before you attack me personally please provide some links to creditable data with regards to the stats and confidence intervals. 'Likely pretty good' would not get accepted in a published report!
<<winmail.dat>>
_______________________________________________ Aus-soaring mailing list [email protected] To check or change subscription details, visit: http://lists.internode.on.net/mailman/listinfo/aus-soaring
