Approved.

-----Original Message-----
From: Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 1:05 PM
To: Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org>; Daniel Kahn Gillmor 
<d...@fifthhorseman.net>; Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melni...@isode.com>; Bernie 
Hoeneisen <ber...@pep-project.org>
Cc: Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com>; bernie.hoenei...@pep-project.org; 
rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; lamps-...@ietf.org; lamps-cha...@ietf.org; Russ 
Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com>; auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9787 
<draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-17> for your review

Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless you 
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


Hi Authors and AD*,

Apologies for the confusion!

*Roman - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes 
submitted by the authors:
- Section 4.5.1: added text
- Section 6.3: updated text
- Section 8.1.1: added text
- Section 9.5: added text
- Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598)

See this diff file for the changes:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html

Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other document 
files accordingly.

The files have been posted here (please refresh) :
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf

The relevant diff files have been posted here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive diff) 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes 
side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last 
version to this one) 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between 
last version and this)

Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787

Thank you,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Jul 14, 2025, at 10:26 AM, Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Roman is the responsible AD for this draft!!
>
> Deb
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 1:25 PM Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> 
> wrote:
> Hi Authors and Deb*,
>
> *Deb - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes 
> submitted by the authors:
> - Section 4.5.1: added text
> - Section 6.3: updated text
> - Section 8.1.1: added text
> - Section 9.5: added text
> - Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598)
>
> See this diff file for the changes:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html
>
>
> Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other document 
> files accordingly.
>
> The files have been posted here (please refresh) :
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf
>
> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive 
> diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html 
> (AUTH48 changes) 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 
> changes side by side) 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version 
> to this one) 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff 
> between last version and this)
>
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/ap
>
>
> > On Jul 11, 2025, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi RFC Editor--
> >
> > Please find attached an updated rfc9787.xml.
> >
> > This includes the fine-tuning proposed by Bernie and vetted by 
> > myself and Alexey.  It also includes the change in the MIME diagrams 
> > to use only Unicode BOX DRAWINGS characters, as one half of a 
> > workaround for
> > https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/1245 (the other half 
> > depends on merging https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/pull/1261)
> >
> > Thanks for bearing with us on this process.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >        --dkg
> >
>

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to