Hi Roman, Thank you for your approval. It has been noted: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787
Best regards, RFC Editor/ap > On Jul 16, 2025, at 10:54 AM, Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org> wrote: > > Approved. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 1:05 PM > To: Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org>; Daniel Kahn Gillmor > <d...@fifthhorseman.net>; Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melni...@isode.com>; Bernie > Hoeneisen <ber...@pep-project.org> > Cc: Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com>; bernie.hoenei...@pep-project.org; > rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; lamps-...@ietf.org; lamps-cha...@ietf.org; Russ > Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com>; auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> > Subject: Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9787 > <draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-17> for your review > > Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > > Hi Authors and AD*, > > Apologies for the confusion! > > *Roman - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes > submitted by the authors: > - Section 4.5.1: added text > - Section 6.3: updated text > - Section 8.1.1: added text > - Section 9.5: added text > - Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598) > > See this diff file for the changes: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html > > Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other document > files accordingly. > > The files have been posted here (please refresh) : > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf > > The relevant diff files have been posted here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive diff) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes > side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last > version to this one) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between > last version and this) > > Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787 > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/ap > >> On Jul 14, 2025, at 10:26 AM, Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Roman is the responsible AD for this draft!! >> >> Deb >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 1:25 PM Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >> wrote: >> Hi Authors and Deb*, >> >> *Deb - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes >> submitted by the authors: >> - Section 4.5.1: added text >> - Section 6.3: updated text >> - Section 8.1.1: added text >> - Section 9.5: added text >> - Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598) >> >> See this diff file for the changes: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html >> >> >> Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other document >> files accordingly. >> >> The files have been posted here (please refresh) : >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf >> >> The relevant diff files have been posted here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive >> diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html >> (AUTH48 changes) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 >> changes side by side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version >> to this one) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff >> between last version and this) >> >> Thank you, >> RFC Editor/ap >> >> >>> On Jul 11, 2025, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi RFC Editor-- >>> >>> Please find attached an updated rfc9787.xml. >>> >>> This includes the fine-tuning proposed by Bernie and vetted by >>> myself and Alexey. It also includes the change in the MIME diagrams >>> to use only Unicode BOX DRAWINGS characters, as one half of a >>> workaround for >>> https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/1245 (the other half >>> depends on merging https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/pull/1261) >>> >>> Thanks for bearing with us on this process. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> --dkg >>> >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
