Hi DKG, Apologies for the delay. Your suggestion to update xml2rfc is being actively considered.
Please hold off on updating the artwork in RFC-to-be 9788 until a decision has been made. Thank you, RFC Editor/ap > On Jul 2, 2025, at 2:57 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> > wrote: > > On Fri 2025-06-27 22:19:31 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I propose replacing ↧ and ⇩ with symbols from the BOX DRAWINGS range >> instead. >> >> The attached proposed XML file makes this substitution for the MIME tree >> diagrams. It will still render as misaligned, however, as long as the >> fix [0] is not applied to xml2rfc. >> >> If you think this is reasonable, let me know and i can try to make a >> comparable revision for RFC 9788. > > So far i've only heard back from Bernie about this change to the > codepoints used in the "ascii-art" MIME diagrams (and he approves). > Doing the same work for RFC-to-be 9788 is more substantial (because of > all the test vectors) but i'm inclined to go ahead and do it anyway in > the hopes that there will be no objections. > > If anyone is inclined to contest this change, please let me know so i > don't waste my time fixing up the other draft! > > And, if the RFC editor approves, i encourage you to update the xml > published at https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml too. > > Thanks, > > --dkg -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
