Hi Bernie, This is a friendly reminder that we await your review and approval of the updated files. Once we receive your approval, we will move this document forward in the publication process.
The files have been posted here (please refresh) : https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf The relevant diff files have been posted here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version to this one) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this) Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787 Thank you, RFC Editor/ap > On Jul 16, 2025, at 12:09 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > Hi Roman, > > Thank you for your approval. It has been noted: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787 > > Best regards, > RFC Editor/ap > >> On Jul 16, 2025, at 10:54 AM, Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org> wrote: >> >> Approved. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 1:05 PM >> To: Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org>; Daniel Kahn Gillmor >> <d...@fifthhorseman.net>; Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melni...@isode.com>; >> Bernie Hoeneisen <ber...@pep-project.org> >> Cc: Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com>; bernie.hoenei...@pep-project.org; >> rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; lamps-...@ietf.org; lamps-cha...@ietf.org; Russ >> Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com>; auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> >> Subject: Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9787 >> <draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-17> for your review >> >> Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless you >> recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> >> Hi Authors and AD*, >> >> Apologies for the confusion! >> >> *Roman - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes >> submitted by the authors: >> - Section 4.5.1: added text >> - Section 6.3: updated text >> - Section 8.1.1: added text >> - Section 9.5: added text >> - Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598) >> >> See this diff file for the changes: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html >> >> Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other document >> files accordingly. >> >> The files have been posted here (please refresh) : >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf >> >> The relevant diff files have been posted here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive diff) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 >> changes side by side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version to >> this one) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html >> (rfcdiff between last version and this) >> >> Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787 >> >> Thank you, >> RFC Editor/ap >> >>> On Jul 14, 2025, at 10:26 AM, Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Roman is the responsible AD for this draft!! >>> >>> Deb >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 1:25 PM Alanna Paloma >>> <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>> Hi Authors and Deb*, >>> >>> *Deb - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes >>> submitted by the authors: >>> - Section 4.5.1: added text >>> - Section 6.3: updated text >>> - Section 8.1.1: added text >>> - Section 9.5: added text >>> - Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598) >>> >>> See this diff file for the changes: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html >>> >>> >>> Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other document >>> files accordingly. >>> >>> The files have been posted here (please refresh) : >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf >>> >>> The relevant diff files have been posted here: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive >>> diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html >>> (AUTH48 changes) >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 >>> changes side by side) >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version >>> to this one) >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff >>> between last version and this) >>> >>> Thank you, >>> RFC Editor/ap >>> >>> >>>> On Jul 11, 2025, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi RFC Editor-- >>>> >>>> Please find attached an updated rfc9787.xml. >>>> >>>> This includes the fine-tuning proposed by Bernie and vetted by >>>> myself and Alexey. It also includes the change in the MIME diagrams >>>> to use only Unicode BOX DRAWINGS characters, as one half of a >>>> workaround for >>>> https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/1245 (the other half >>>> depends on merging https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/pull/1261) >>>> >>>> Thanks for bearing with us on this process. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> --dkg >>>> >>> >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
