Hi Bernie, This is a friendly reminder that we are awaiting the additional editorial changes to add to the document files.
— FILES (please refresh) — https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version to this one) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this) Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787 Thank you, RFC Editor/ap > On Jul 26, 2025, at 4:33 AM, Bernie Hoeneisen <ber...@pep-project.org> wrote: > > Status Update: The authors are currently working on the last editorial > changes. > > On 23.07.25 18:45, Alanna Paloma wrote: >> Hi Bernie, >> >> This is a friendly reminder that we await your review and approval of the >> updated files. Once we receive your approval, we will move this document >> forward in the publication process. >> >> The files have been posted here (please refresh) : >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf >> >> The relevant diff files have been posted here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive diff) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 >> changes side by side) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version to >> this one) >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between >> last version and this) >> >> Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787 >> >> Thank you, >> RFC Editor/ap >> >>> On Jul 16, 2025, at 12:09 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Roman, >>> >>> Thank you for your approval. It has been noted: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787 >>> >>> Best regards, >>> RFC Editor/ap >>> >>>> On Jul 16, 2025, at 10:54 AM, Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Approved. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2025 1:05 PM >>>> To: Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org>; Daniel Kahn Gillmor >>>> <d...@fifthhorseman.net>; Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melni...@isode.com>; >>>> Bernie Hoeneisen <ber...@pep-project.org> >>>> Cc: Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com>; bernie.hoenei...@pep-project.org; >>>> rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; lamps-...@ietf.org; lamps-cha...@ietf.org; Russ >>>> Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com>; auth48archive >>>> <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9787 >>>> <draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-17> for your review >>>> >>>> Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless >>>> you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Authors and AD*, >>>> >>>> Apologies for the confusion! >>>> >>>> *Roman - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes >>>> submitted by the authors: >>>> - Section 4.5.1: added text >>>> - Section 6.3: updated text >>>> - Section 8.1.1: added text >>>> - Section 9.5: added text >>>> - Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598) >>>> >>>> See this diff file for the changes: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html >>>> >>>> Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other >>>> document files accordingly. >>>> >>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh) : >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf >>>> >>>> The relevant diff files have been posted here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive diff) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 >>>> changes) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html >>>> (AUTH48 changes side by side) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version to >>>> this one) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html >>>> (rfcdiff between last version and this) >>>> >>>> Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787 >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> RFC Editor/ap >>>> >>>>> On Jul 14, 2025, at 10:26 AM, Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Roman is the responsible AD for this draft!! >>>>> >>>>> Deb >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 1:25 PM Alanna Paloma >>>>> <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >>>>> Hi Authors and Deb*, >>>>> >>>>> *Deb - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes >>>>> submitted by the authors: >>>>> - Section 4.5.1: added text >>>>> - Section 6.3: updated text >>>>> - Section 8.1.1: added text >>>>> - Section 9.5: added text >>>>> - Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598) >>>>> >>>>> See this diff file for the changes: >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other >>>>> document files accordingly. >>>>> >>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh) : >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf >>>>> >>>>> The relevant diff files have been posted here: >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive >>>>> diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html >>>>> (AUTH48 changes) >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 >>>>> changes side by side) >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version >>>>> to this one) >>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff >>>>> between last version and this) >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> RFC Editor/ap >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 11, 2025, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor >>>>>> <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi RFC Editor-- >>>>>> >>>>>> Please find attached an updated rfc9787.xml. >>>>>> >>>>>> This includes the fine-tuning proposed by Bernie and vetted by >>>>>> myself and Alexey. It also includes the change in the MIME diagrams >>>>>> to use only Unicode BOX DRAWINGS characters, as one half of a >>>>>> workaround for >>>>>> https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/1245 (the other half >>>>>> depends on merging https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/pull/1261) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for bearing with us on this process. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> --dkg >>>>>> > <sender_key.asc> -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
