Hi Authors and AD*, Apologies for the confusion!
*Roman - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes submitted by the authors: - Section 4.5.1: added text - Section 6.3: updated text - Section 8.1.1: added text - Section 9.5: added text - Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598) See this diff file for the changes: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other document files accordingly. The files have been posted here (please refresh) : https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf The relevant diff files have been posted here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes side by side) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version to this one) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between last version and this) Please see the AUTH48 status page for this document here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9787 Thank you, RFC Editor/ap > On Jul 14, 2025, at 10:26 AM, Deb Cooley <debcool...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > Roman is the responsible AD for this draft!! > > Deb > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 1:25 PM Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > Hi Authors and Deb*, > > *Deb - As the AD, please review and approve of the following changes > submitted by the authors: > - Section 4.5.1: added text > - Section 6.3: updated text > - Section 8.1.1: added text > - Section 9.5: added text > - Section 12.1: added normative reference (RFC 9598) > > See this diff file for the changes: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-ad-diff.html > > > Authors - Thank you for the updated XML file. We updated the other document > files accordingly. > > The files have been posted here (please refresh) : > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.xml > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787.pdf > > The relevant diff files have been posted here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-diff.html (comprehensive diff) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-auth48rfcdiff.html (AUTH48 changes > side by side) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastdiff.html (last version to > this one) > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9787-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff between > last version and this) > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/ap > > > > On Jul 11, 2025, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> > > wrote: > > > > Hi RFC Editor-- > > > > Please find attached an updated rfc9787.xml. > > > > This includes the fine-tuning proposed by Bernie and vetted by myself > > and Alexey. It also includes the change in the MIME diagrams to use > > only Unicode BOX DRAWINGS characters, as one half of a workaround for > > https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/issues/1245 (the other half > > depends on merging https://github.com/ietf-tools/xml2rfc/pull/1261) > > > > Thanks for bearing with us on this process. > > > > Regards, > > > > --dkg > > > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
