Hi Megan, I've updated the section numbers as reflected in the tables below:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters Let me know if anything was missed. Thanks, Sabrina On Tue May 19 14:02:12 2026, [email protected] wrote: > IANA, > > When getting this document ready for publication, we noticed that the > following updates are needed to make the registries match the > document: > > [Summary - Section numbers in the document were shifted necessitating > updates for each registry] > > > 1) Section numbers in the “SSH Agent Protocol Message Type Numbers” > registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters: > > All the section numbers were adjusted during the editing process. > > Please see the table in Section 9.2 of https://www.rfc- > editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. > > 2) Section numbers in the “SSH Agent Key Constraint Numbers” registry > at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters have been similarly > affected. > > Please see the table in Section 9.3 of https://www.rfc- > editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. > > 3) Section numbers in the “SSH Agent Signature Flags” registry at > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters also need to be > updated. > > Please see the table in Section 9.5 of https://www.rfc- > editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. > > 4) Section numbers in the “SSH Agent Extension Request Names” registry > at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters require updates. > > Please see the table in Section 9.6 of https://www.rfc- > editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. > > 5) Section numbers in the “Extension Names" registry at > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters have been similarly > affected. > > Please see the table in Section 9.7 of https://www.rfc- > editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. > > 6) Section numbers in the “Connection Protocol Channel Request Names” > registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters will also > need to be updated. > > Please see the table in Section 9.8 of https://www.rfc- > editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. > > 7) Section numbers in the “Connection Protocol Channel Types” registry > at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters have been similarly > affected. > > Please see the table in Section 9.9 of https://www.rfc- > editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. > > Thank you. > > Megan Ferguson > RFC Production Center > > > On May 18, 2026, at 4:01 PM, Damien Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Megan, > > > > All looks good - I approve. > > > > Thanks, > > Damien > > > > > > On Mon, 18 May 2026, Megan Ferguson wrote: > > > >> Hi Damien, > >> > >> After further review and discussion, we have decided not to use > >> <sourcecode type=“ssh-message”>; the type will instead be left > >> blank. > >> > >> Note that we have also converted the items marked as <sourcecode> in > >> Section 8 into tables. > >> > >> Please confirm this version works for you, and we can move forward > >> in the publication process. > >> > >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.pdf > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.html > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.xml > >> > >> The files have been posted here (please refresh): > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-diff.html > >> (comprehensive) > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-rfcdiff.html (side by > >> side) > >> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 > >> only) > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-auth48rfcdiff.html (side > >> by side) > >> > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-lastdiff.html (last > >> version to this) > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-lastrfcdiff.html (side by > >> side) > >> > >> The AUTH48 status page is viewable here: > >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9987 > >> > >> Thank you. > >> > >> Megan Ferguson > >> RFC Production Center > >> > >> > >>> On May 17, 2026, at 5:23 PM, Damien Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, 15 May 2026, Megan Ferguson wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Damien, > >>>> > >>>> Thank you for your prompt reply and updated file. We have adopted > >>>> the XML with only the slight change of sorting the references. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>>> Regarding sourcecode types: > >>>> > >>>>>> Either blank or, if it is possible to define a new sourcecode > >>>>>> type, > >>>>>> then "ssh-message" might be a useful addition - I'd certainly > >>>>>> use > >>>>>> it in other drafts I have pending. > >>>> > >>>> We went ahead and sent a request to the mailing list > >>>> ([email protected].) mentioned at https://rpc-wiki.rfc- > >>>> editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=sourcecode-types for a new “ssh- > >>>> message” type. For this document, would you like to leave them > >>>> blank or wait for a new “ssh-message" to be available (these > >>>> wheels usually turn in just a few days)? > >>> > >>> I'm happy to wait a couple more days, but if there's no reply say > >>> by the end of the week then I think it would be fine to go ahead > >>> with a blank sourcecode type. > >>> > >>>> As you otherwise indicated your approval of the document in this > >>>> form, we have updated your status to “Approved” at the AUTH48 > >>>> status page (see link below). Once we hear back on the sourcecode > >>>> type question, we will be ready to move this document forward in > >>>> the publication process. > >>> > >>> Excellent, thanks! > >>> > >>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.pdf > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.html > >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.xml > >>> > >>> These look good to me. > >>> > >>> Kind regards, > >>> Damien > >> > >> -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
