Sabrina, Updates confirmed - thanks!
We will move this document forward in the publication process at this time. Thank you. Megan Ferguson RFC Production Center > On May 22, 2026, at 12:34 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Megan, > > I've updated the section numbers as reflected in the tables below: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters > > Let me know if anything was missed. > > Thanks, > Sabrina > > On Tue May 19 14:02:12 2026, [email protected] wrote: >> IANA, >> >> When getting this document ready for publication, we noticed that the >> following updates are needed to make the registries match the >> document: >> >> [Summary - Section numbers in the document were shifted necessitating >> updates for each registry] >> >> >> 1) Section numbers in the “SSH Agent Protocol Message Type Numbers” >> registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters: >> >> All the section numbers were adjusted during the editing process. >> >> Please see the table in Section 9.2 of https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. >> >> 2) Section numbers in the “SSH Agent Key Constraint Numbers” registry >> at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters have been similarly >> affected. >> >> Please see the table in Section 9.3 of https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. >> >> 3) Section numbers in the “SSH Agent Signature Flags” registry at >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters also need to be >> updated. >> >> Please see the table in Section 9.5 of https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. >> >> 4) Section numbers in the “SSH Agent Extension Request Names” registry >> at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters require updates. >> >> Please see the table in Section 9.6 of https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. >> >> 5) Section numbers in the “Extension Names" registry at >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters have been similarly >> affected. >> >> Please see the table in Section 9.7 of https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. >> >> 6) Section numbers in the “Connection Protocol Channel Request Names” >> registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters will also >> need to be updated. >> >> Please see the table in Section 9.8 of https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. >> >> 7) Section numbers in the “Connection Protocol Channel Types” registry >> at https://www.iana.org/assignments/ssh-parameters have been similarly >> affected. >> >> Please see the table in Section 9.9 of https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt for the new numbers. >> >> Thank you. >> >> Megan Ferguson >> RFC Production Center >> >>> On May 18, 2026, at 4:01 PM, Damien Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Megan, >>> >>> All looks good - I approve. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Damien >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 18 May 2026, Megan Ferguson wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Damien, >>>> >>>> After further review and discussion, we have decided not to use >>>> <sourcecode type=“ssh-message”>; the type will instead be left >>>> blank. >>>> >>>> Note that we have also converted the items marked as <sourcecode> in >>>> Section 8 into tables. >>>> >>>> Please confirm this version works for you, and we can move forward >>>> in the publication process. >>>> >>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.pdf >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.xml >>>> >>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-diff.html >>>> (comprehensive) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-rfcdiff.html (side by >>>> side) >>>> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 >>>> only) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-auth48rfcdiff.html (side >>>> by side) >>>> >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-lastdiff.html (last >>>> version to this) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987-lastrfcdiff.html (side by >>>> side) >>>> >>>> The AUTH48 status page is viewable here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9987 >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Megan Ferguson >>>> RFC Production Center >>>> >>>> >>>>> On May 17, 2026, at 5:23 PM, Damien Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 15 May 2026, Megan Ferguson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Damien, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for your prompt reply and updated file. We have adopted >>>>>> the XML with only the slight change of sorting the references. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>>> Regarding sourcecode types: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Either blank or, if it is possible to define a new sourcecode >>>>>>>> type, >>>>>>>> then "ssh-message" might be a useful addition - I'd certainly >>>>>>>> use >>>>>>>> it in other drafts I have pending. >>>>>> >>>>>> We went ahead and sent a request to the mailing list >>>>>> ([email protected].) mentioned at https://rpc-wiki.rfc- >>>>>> editor.org/rpc/wiki/doku.php?id=sourcecode-types for a new “ssh- >>>>>> message” type. For this document, would you like to leave them >>>>>> blank or wait for a new “ssh-message" to be available (these >>>>>> wheels usually turn in just a few days)? >>>>> >>>>> I'm happy to wait a couple more days, but if there's no reply say >>>>> by the end of the week then I think it would be fine to go ahead >>>>> with a blank sourcecode type. >>>>> >>>>>> As you otherwise indicated your approval of the document in this >>>>>> form, we have updated your status to “Approved” at the AUTH48 >>>>>> status page (see link below). Once we hear back on the sourcecode >>>>>> type question, we will be ready to move this document forward in >>>>>> the publication process. >>>>> >>>>> Excellent, thanks! >>>>> >>>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.txt >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.pdf >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.html >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9987.xml >>>>> >>>>> These look good to me. >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Damien >>>> >>>> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
