Jean Hollis Weber wrote: > I really hope that Linda might be able to find some time this week to offer > another version of her own. I'm a bit uneasy that our best graphic designer > doesn't like a design that the rest of us amateurs are about to adopt.
I don't want to adopt a design that Linda doesn't like. Linda is a professional graphics designer. We would be wise to seek her guidance. It would be sad if we had a sub-optimal design because we failed to put our most skilled member in charge. I believe in meritocracy. For the book covers, I Linda should provide guidance, and make the final decision. Just like we do for the rest of the guides. For written text, Jean and Janet provide guidance, and make the final decisions. That is as it should be. > I'd also like to hear from some other people, if anyone else has an > opinion. Although everyone who has commented so far (including me) says > they like Daniel's version, we're heard from only a few people. I did not mean to advocate that page as much as people seem to think. I was just answering Peter's request to put the logo down there. It's good to let people try out their ideas, and this was just part of that. I did say that visually, they both look good to me. I said that what I liked about the latter was getting a bit of recognition. But please don't take that out of proportion. First, it was a side comment. Second, even if we were to decide that we'd like a bit more recognition, there are a bazillion ways to go about it. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org |
