Andre Schnabel wrote:
At least Daniel has been aware of the discussion. But instead of telling
the Council, that OOoAuthors is misjustified, he sends a message to
OOoAuthors that the Council will ask OOoAuthors to move and after that
will tell, that OOoAuthors betrayed OOo.
Andre, I didn't say that. Please review the list posts. We don't want to
have misunderstandings here. Marco suggested that someone (he didn't say
OOo Council) might say say that OOoAuthors betrayed OOo. I responded to
that message saying that, thought this was possible, it didn't seem
right to me.
As for contacting the council, I'm not sure what it is I'd say. The
council knows as much about the plans of Friends of OD as I do.
Andre, let's try to not escalate this. We can all be reasonable. The
OOoCouncil made a decision, which I'm sure looks reasonable from your
point of view, and OOoAuthors will vote to decide something that looks
reasonable from our point of view. Even if we disagree, we can still
disagree amicably.
*sigh* ok, I'll raise this again and ask for replacing *the* with *some
of*.
Thank you for your efforts Andre. I can't speak for OOoAuthors, but I
appreciate that you want to reach an amicable resolution as I do.
Please also mention that OOoAuthors is not the one selling the guides.
And OOoAuthors is not planning to sell the guides. We welcome third
parties selling the guides just like the OOo CDROM prject welcomes third
parties selling OOo disks.
Best,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
/\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/ No trees were harmed in the creation of this email.
\/_/ However, a significant number of electrons were
/ were severely inconvenienced.
