Andre Schnabel wrote:
Someone might. But consider that the OOo council has already talked
about telling OOoAuthors to move. They thought of it. It seems wrong
to say to someone "you can't use our list anymore" and when they move
then say "see, they betrayed us!".
No, it was not discussed to tell you to move, just because we want you
to move away from the OOo lists. *sigh*
That is what Daniel was talking about, the council discussing
asking OOoAuthors to move the *list*. We are thinking of moving
the *list*. What's the problem?
Second reason was the announcement of selling OOoAuthors documentations
and using it for OOoAuthors. If you read the Council lists, it was
discussed to ask OOoAuthors to give some of the profits to OOo (in form
of Team OOo e.V.).
In this note,
http://council.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discuss&msgNo=739
Louis Suarez-Potts did not say *some of* the profits, he
said *the* profits. Has Louis's initial wording been amended? All
the notes I saw simply said +1's from other council members, with
no further discussion.
Regards, Jean
