> From: James M Snell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > +1 on this. Some of us sleepers still have an active interest in the > project but no time to dedicate. Having those extra unused accounts > sitting out there is a security risk, despite the changes > made a while > back. I'd say ping the sleepers and see if they intend to > make an active > contribution in the near future. If not, remove them from > the list. If > they say yes, but still don't commit after a while, remove > them from the > list. Any code contributions I may make will be filtered through the > various other IBMers in the group so feel free to remove my > name from the > contributor list.
I'm in this too--just make sure you don't encourage the SysAdmin to remove an account for someone who is an active committer on other projects (like me). It was humorous. I had a contract to work on Axis. By the time I got committer access, the contract period of performance was over, and the company didn't have enough money to keep it going. :( In the mean time, I have been beat down with my time. So unless anyone wants to give me another contract I should probably have my karma removed for this project. I don't see my situation changing any time in the near future. > > - James M Snell/Fresno/IBM > Web services architecture and strategy > Internet Emerging Technologies, IBM > 544.9035 TIE line > 559.587.1233 Office > 919.486.0077 Voice Mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Programming Web Services With SOAP, O'reilly & Associates, ISBN > 0596000952 > > == > Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not > be terrified, > > do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you > wherever you > go. > - Joshua 1:9 > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject: Re: too many "inactive" committers > > > > No, I'm serious: I think it makes absolute sense to clean up > committer lists every once in a while- people become active > with the good intention of being active for ever. However, > reality beats them down often. > > Getting new blood flowing thru the project is critical to > good health IMO! > > Cutting out all the "sleeper" developers would highlight the > real status of the Axis committer community and hopefully > that'll encourage more people to become active. > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "R J Scheuerle Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:49 PM > Subject: Re: too many "inactive" committers > > > > I don't think its necessary to de-committerize you Sanjiva :-). > > > > Please stay! > > > > Rich Scheuerle > > XML & Web Services Development > > 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115) > > > > > > > > > > "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 05/27/2002 06:50 PM > > Please respond to axis-dev > > > > > > To: "Axis Development List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > cc: > > Subject: too many "inactive" committers > > > > > > > > I sense that there's concern that there are too many inactive > > committers on axis-dev. > > > > I'm definitely one of the culprits. I volunteer to become a non- > > committer to help reduce the "deadwood." Can someone please > > "de-committerize" me? > > > > Hopefully having fewer inactive committers will help get more "new > > blood" into this project. > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > > > > > > > >
