Perhaps 'active' and 'emeritus'?
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@jakarta.apache.org/msg05435.html
Un saludo,
Alex.
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Russell Butek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: martes 28 de mayo de 2002 17:39
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: too many "inactive" committers
>
>
> What are we trying to accomplish? There is nothing
> technically wrong with
> having inactive committers. It does not restrict new blood.
> Is it merely
> a perception problem? If so, where does that perception come
> from? The
> web page listing committers? It would be much less drastic to simply
> change this web page, perhaps list committers in two columns:
> active and
> inactive.
>
> Russell Butek
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> James M Snell/Fresno/IBM@IBMUS on 05/28/2002 10:23:56 AM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Re: too many "inactive" committers
>
>
>
> +1 on this. Some of us sleepers still have an active interest in the
> project but no time to dedicate. Having those extra unused accounts
> sitting out there is a security risk, despite the changes made a while
> back. I'd say ping the sleepers and see if they intend to
> make an active
> contribution in the near future. If not, remove them from
> the list. If
> they say yes, but still don't commit after a while, remove
> them from the
> list. Any code contributions I may make will be filtered through the
> various other IBMers in the group so feel free to remove my
> name from the
> contributor list.
>
> - James M Snell/Fresno/IBM
> Web services architecture and strategy
> Internet Emerging Technologies, IBM
> 544.9035 TIE line
> 559.587.1233 Office
> 919.486.0077 Voice Mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Programming Web Services With SOAP, O'reilly & Associates, ISBN
> 0596000952
>
> ==
> Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not
> be terrified,
>
> do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you
> wherever you
> go.
> - Joshua 1:9
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject: Re: too many "inactive" committers
>
>
>
> No, I'm serious: I think it makes absolute sense to clean up
> committer lists every once in a while- people become active
> with the good intention of being active for ever. However,
> reality beats them down often.
>
> Getting new blood flowing thru the project is critical to
> good health IMO!
>
> Cutting out all the "sleeper" developers would highlight the
> real status of the Axis committer community and hopefully
> that'll encourage more people to become active.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "R J Scheuerle Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 7:49 PM
> Subject: Re: too many "inactive" committers
>
>
> > I don't think its necessary to de-committerize you Sanjiva :-).
> >
> > Please stay!
> >
> > Rich Scheuerle
> > XML & Web Services Development
> > 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 05/27/2002 06:50 PM
> > Please respond to axis-dev
> >
> >
> > To: "Axis Development List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc:
> > Subject: too many "inactive" committers
> >
> >
> >
> > I sense that there's concern that there are too many inactive
> > committers on axis-dev.
> >
> > I'm definitely one of the culprits. I volunteer to become a non-
> > committer to help reduce the "deadwood." Can someone please
> > "de-committerize" me?
> >
> > Hopefully having fewer inactive committers will help get more
> > "new blood" into this project.
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
