1. What is an "established fact" in Hebrew? 2. It seems to me that KLL is 'include'.
Isaac Fried, Boston University On Nov 4, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat. wrote: > mike, > > i agree with isaac fried that TAKLIYTH is derived from > (or co-derived with) KL/KLH=end, terminate. > > [you may ignore his very non-orthodox explanation for the prefix T, > which he states as if it were an established fact (it is not)]. > > strong, too, derives TAKLIT H8503 from the root KLH H3615 amd > mentions its other occurrences: > > Neh 3:21, Job 11:7, 26:10, 28:3. > > these five citations show a variety of meanings, and strong defines > their > common sense: "completion; by implication, extremity: -end, > perfect, perfection." > >>>> De: Mike Burke <[email protected]> >>> But where does the idea of perfection come in? > > i would consider the english expressions "to exhaustion/ > exhaustively/to the > limit". a particular emotion reaches perfection only if it is taken > to its > very extreme, i.e. to exhaustion=end=taklit. also in job 28:3 any > mistery of > nature assumes its meaning only when studied to exhaustion. both > are in > perfect agreement with strong's definition. > > IN CONTRAST, in Neh 3:21 taklit is simply the technical word for > "end of/termination of". > > nir cohen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > b-hebrew mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew _______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
