isaac, .... never mind!
nir On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:35:30 -0500, Isaac Fried wrote > The answer to this is very simple: LOOK AT THE OT TEXT (as written!) and you > will see right away how "exactly" it is used. > > As to the question of what is its composition, here it is: > > WA = BA, 'come, be', a variant of HAWA, and HAYA, possible forerunners > of HU and HIY. Hence, WAYIGA$ = בא-היא-גש BA-HIY-GA$, with HIY > referring to the performer of the act GA$. Otherwise, the quibbles on the > WAYIQTOL appear to me to be but a מהומה על מאומה > > Isaac Fried, Boston University > > > > On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat. wrote: > since WAYIQTOL is part of the OT, how exactly was it > used WITHIN THE OT TEXT AS WRITTEN. -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org)
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
