Hi Colleagues,
In Michael Fox's commentary on Ecclesiastes, *A Time to Tear Down and a Time to Build Up*, Fox argued that the word *'olam* (world, eternity) in Eccl 3:11 is a metathesized corruption of an original *'amal* (toil). Fox gives a number of supporting arguments for his contention (which is actually a revival of an earlier suggestion). I won't list them all here, but one of his major points is that the idea that God has put toil in men's hearts corresponds with one of Qohelet's main points, that God has put a heavy burden (*'inyan*) on men (1:13; 3:10), i.e., the burden of trying to figure out what life means in light life's absurdity. He also does a very intriguing comparison between the flow of thought in 3:9-11 and 8:17, concludes that both passages are saying basically the same thing, and argues that the verb *'amal* in 8:17 corresponds to his suggested noun * 'amal* in 3:11. When I wrote my commentary on Ecclesiates a few years ago, I noted Fox's theory, remarked on how attractive it was, but opted for the traditional *'olam* rather than Fox's suggested *'amal*, in light of the lack of any corroboration from any other Hebrew manuscripts or versional evidence. I was about 51-49 at that time in favor of the traditional "eternity." However, several years later now, though I am usually very reluctant to give much consideration to textual emendations, I find myself closer to about 60-40 in favor of Fox's suggestion. I know George is writing a commentary on Ecclesiates; perhaps he'll weigh in on this. What do the rest of you think? Blessings, Jerry Jerry Shepherd Taylor Seminary Edmonton, Alberta [email protected]
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
