Richard Lockwood wrote:
You are Jacob Neilsen in disguise and I claim my five pounds. You want to see everything in black Times Roman on a grey background with no images. You haven't yet twigged that for the web to be a rich source of ideas, information and innovation, someone needs to pay for it. Which means paid for content (generally porn - the most successful paid for content by a mile) or advertising and marketing spend. You choose. Download a copy of Lynx, or Netscape 2. That should do the trick. Cheers, Rich.
Wow. I thought all the people like you had gone off to design DVD interfaces in about '98.
You've clearly never read any Neilsen. stef
On 8/11/05, *J.P.Knight* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Tim Scollick wrote: > Big sites with > lots of content will continue to use html but the marketing dollars > will continue to gravitate to Flash. Which to my mind is a real plus point for Flash. By not installing the flash plugin all the stupid cartoons and marketing drivel disappears from the web and you're left with the content. Which in the case of some overly marketing driven sites can be, er, somewhat limited and often indicates a company trying to use smoke and mirrors to cover up crappy products and/or poor customer service. I therefore tend to think of Flash as a "wheat-from-chaff separator". :-) YMMV, Jim'll - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk <http://backstage.bbc.co.uk> discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-- /* Stefan Magdalinski +447769 666528 (phone) smagdali (IM/flickr/skype/etc) */ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
