Was this relevant to me, Bill? I was reporting trouble with delay in loading jqt...

Anyway, assuming you did mean me, and assuming you mean run/launch pad/qtdemo or ..../wddemo:

opengl shader - I don't see an opengl demo of any sort, let alone shader, whether under qtdemo or under wddemo

   (Package Manager shows that there are various graphics addons,
   including gl2,  but not opengl.
   Please note that I DO HAVE addons/graphics/gl1ut under J801, and
   J801's wddemo does include opengl simple and opengl demo, though
   opengl shader doesn't appear there)


quickview2 - under qtdemo - a box appears with a single edit window, showing a file name, c:/d/j802/addons/ide/qt/demo/quick2.qml
                       the source code starts:

               "NB. quickview2   / NB. wrapping empty comments

               NB. !!! this is experimental and *will* change...  / NB.

               NB. cover for the QQuickView"

samegame - under wddemo - seems to run ok, though I don't know what it's supposed to do. The window initially shows "GAME" with S pushing the G down, repeatedly, accompanied by unchanging text "1 Player / 2 Players / Zen Puzzle "; clicking somewhere in that display results in what is a game layout with a rectangle of circles filled in with various colours.
                       Clicking a circle produces some tetra-like effect.

Is that what you wanted?

All the best,

Mike

On 26/05/2014 01:31, bill lam wrote:
this version of jqt needs to load dll than previous version in order to support 
QtQuick.

Did it ran all demos ok, in particular, opengl shader, quickview2 and samegame ?

26.05.2014, в 7:25, Mike Day<[email protected]>  написал(а):

With both profile. and profilex.ijs disabled: ~ 60sec
similar with startup.ijs disabled in addition,
about 120sec (ie worse) with startup.ijs only disabled,  profile. and 
profilex.ijs both enabled,
but I suspect these are not significantly different from each other nor from 
those timings I reported earlier,   as I've got a scan and file-upload (neither 
directly related to J) running.

As it happens,  that scan (AVG "Fix Performance") reported several registry 
errors;  it didn't explain them,  but a number of QT registry entries were mentioned as 
being in error.  Sorry I didn't write them down.  It thinks it fixed them,  but with no 
improvement in loading time.

FYI,
   JVERSION
Engine: j701/2011-01-10/11:25

Library: 8.02.06

Qt IDE: 1.1.1/5.3.0

Platform: Win 64

Installer: J802 install

InstallPath: c:/d/j802


J801 continues to load fast;  its credentials:
JVERSION

Engine: j701/2011-01-10/11:25

Library: 8.01.028

Qt IDE: 1.0.27/4.8.5

Platform: Win 64

Installer: j801 install

InstallPath: c:/d/j801


Thanks for any other ideas,

Mike

On 25/05/2014 10:43, bill lam wrote:
And also the timing when removing ~bin/profile.ijs

Вс, 25 май 2014, Chris Burke написал(а):
What is the timing when you remove startup.ijs from the config?


On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Mike Day<[email protected]>wrote:

Don't think so.  My first mention 3-4 minutes was pretty subjective.
I've now done a few comparative timings with my wristwatch,  but It's
Sunday morning and it takes too long for exhaustive tests

Anyway, for what it's worth:
Windows Task Manager list of "Apps": Google Chrome/Task
Manager/Thunderbird/W Explorer/W Wordpad, generally consuming little cpu
%age,  Thunderbird highest memory at 60~ MB.

Apologies if this doesn't display well.  I'm using a fixed width font
without tabs (I hope!)

V Approx Time to load JQT  | Avast on/off? |  ZoneAlarm on/off |
setproc_affin_ 2?4 on/off
  90                        |      ON       |         ON |        ON
105                        |      ON       | ON        |        ON
110                        |      ON |         ON        |        ON
100                        |      ON       | ON        |        ON
100                        |      ON       |         OFF |        ON
110                        |      OFF      |         OFF |        ON
110                        |      ON       | ON        |        OFF

Avast on/off means with file-protection on/off
Z/A on/off means with firewall protection on/off
setproc_affin_ 2?4:    My newish laptop has a 4 core cpu - I've been
arbitrarily choosing 2 of them in startup.ijs and wondered whether this
affects the jqt 802's load-time.  Apparently not.

Mike


On 24/05/2014 11:10, bill lam wrote:

Disabling Avast already made it faster. I suspect this line of thought is
correct.

24.05.2014, в 17:31, Mike Day<[email protected]>  написал(а):

  Thanks for that thought,  Bill.  You obviously remember my occasional
problems with downloading j801.

I've just now booted JQT after disabling both my wifi and AVAST's
file-protection for 10 minutes;  JQT's window took about 2-3 minutes to
appear.  Task Manager showed JQT as a background process (not an "App" in
current terminology) using ~ 11% of CPU and about 17MB RAM until the window
appeared.  Once it's shown as an "app", it's shown as using no CPU and 15.8
MB,  that's while it's out of focus, just waiting for me to do something.

So I doubt it's AVAST - I'd had no problem from that quarter with the
download or running the installation.

It might be relevant that I still run Zonealarm as my firewall.

?!

Mike

On 23/05/2014 16:12, bill lam wrote:

Booting up time of 4-5 minutes is ridiculous. Your avast helped
again?

Пт, 23 май 2014, Mike Day писал(а):

I've just installed j802 including JQT under Windows 8.

JVERSION

Engine: j701/2011-01-10/11:25

Library: 8.02.06

Qt IDE: 1.1.1/5.3.0

Platform: Win 64

Installer: J802 install

InstallPath: c:/d/j802


I continue to have user under j802,  ie c:/d/j802/user,   with
corresponding
modifications in jprofilex.ijs.

This set-up has been working fine with j801,  but now there's
typically an
apparent 4-5 minute delay (after clicking on JQT's icon or short-cut
file)
before the JQT term window appears.  Windows' Task Manager shows
JQT.exe as
running immediately after invocation, so I suspect the term window is
suppressed in some way;  I expect it appears as a response to some
window-swapping action (eg alt-tab) on my part,  but so far,  I haven't
spotted what that is.

I also have a little application that runs under J console,  and that
still
fires immediately with j802 just as it did with j801, showing its
dos-type
window as soon as I click the shortcut.

I previously encountered no significant delay in loading JQT with j801.

Any ideas?

Mike

PS - It's not surprising that most replies/comments on the new release
went
to Jprogramming rather than Jbeta - correspondents were replying to its
announcement under the Jprogramming banner!


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums seehttp://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums seehttp://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums seehttp://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums seehttp://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums seehttp://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums seehttp://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums seehttp://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to