For Chris and Bill, I think.

Best to confirm what I implied earlier... I haven’t (knowingly) altered the 
laptop’s setup before or since installing J904 beta.  I’ve had this HP Envy for 
2-3 years.

I see that scale is set to 125% (Recommended)
Resolution is 1920x1080
Landscape 

As for Bill’s remark,

wd’qscreen’ returns (warning - I’m eye-copying from laptop to this iPad as I 
can’t easily email from the iPad here, away from home WiFi) 

406 228 1536 864 96 96 32 1 2147483647 96 96 135

I note that 1.25 * 72 = 90,  not 96 .  But Bill seemed unhappy with 72 anyway.

If you need more information,  it might be better if I send photos or PDFs of 
the laptop’s screen with relevant contents.

Cheers,

Mike

Sent from my iPad

> On 14 Apr 2022, at 16:32, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> wd'qscreen'
> 
> 508 317 1440 900 72 72 24 1 2147483647 72 72 101
> 
> the first 2 numbers are dimension n mm
> 
> 3rd and 4th are pixel sixe
> 
> 72 is dpi
> 
> 
> but this result is incorrect because screen spec should be 13.3-inch
> (diagonal) LED-backlit display with IPS technology; 2560-by-1600 native
> resolution at 227 pixels therefore screen size should 286 by 180 mm
> 
> 
> I'm not sure how to get the correct result from Qt.
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:54 PM chris burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Do you have a High-DPI monitor? I have, and scale it to Double.
>> 
>> Is this a problem on non High-DPI monitors?
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 7:32 AM 'Mike Day' via Beta <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks for confirming my report, Chris.  No suggestions, I’m afraid.
>> I’m
>>> just a humble user.
>>> 
>>> Having said that, I’ve nevertheless Googled Windows difference between QT
>>> 6 & QT 5,  and have found this remark: which might be pertinent:
>>> “High-DPI
>>> Qt 6 supports high-DPI displays on all platforms, and will automatically
>>> account for the display resolution when using higher level APIs such as
>> Qt
>>> Widgets or Qt Quick. Applications only need to provide high-resolution
>>> assets, such as images and icons. The feature is always enabled.
>>> 
>>> Qt 6 changes the default scale factor rounding policy from
>>> Qt::HighDpiScaleFactorRoundingPolicy::Round to
>>> Qt::HighDpiScaleFactorRoundingPolicy::PassThrough in order to track
>>> operating system DPI settings accurately. Applications that use Qt
>> Widgets
>>> may encounter graphical glitches at non-integer scale factors, for
>> example
>>> on Windows with a display configured for 175%. In that case, set the
>>> rounding policy to Round to restore Qt 5 behavior”
>>> 
>>> This is at https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/portingguide.html
>>> 
>>> You might possibly find it useful!
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>>> On 14 Apr 2022, at 03:27, chris burke <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I also see a change in the term and edit windows sizes, but don't
>>>> understand it.
>>>> 
>>>> I don't know of any relevant change in the Jqt source. It could be
>>> because
>>>> of the upgrade from Qt 5 to Qt 6, but I don't see anything in the Qt 6
>>>> release notes.
>>>> 
>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:17 AM 'Michael Day' via Beta <
>>> [email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I noticed this feature almost as soon as J904 was installed,  but have
>>>>> only just got round to
>>>>> trying to deal with it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The puzzling feature is the apparent increase in the size of JQt
>> session
>>>>> windows,  under Windows 11
>>>>> in my case,  compared with many previous versions.   I've been using
>>>>> this setting for the default size
>>>>> and location of session windows in    ~user/config/qtide.cfg for some
>>>>> time now:
>>>>> 
>>>>> # J903
>>>>> [Position]
>>>>> Debug=-590 50 540 500
>>>>> Edit=31 32 1806 853
>>>>> Term=40 22 1784 858
>>>>> (The gratuitous non-rounding probably means I'd managed to capture the
>>>>> session windows' properties
>>>>> once upon a time!)
>>>>> 
>>>>> For versions up to J903,   this results in windows more or less
>> filling
>>>>> the screen,  nominally 1920x1080,
>>>>> allowing a smallish view of the "desktop" between J and the task-bar,
>>>>> where jbreak.bat is usually
>>>>> visible!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now,  in J904,  the term and edit windows both stretch too far to the
>>>>> right and too far down.  I
>>>>> was getting round the problem by changing size with the "mouse."
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've now experimented with the settings;   the following achieves
>>>>> windows with top left corners
>>>>> very similar in position to those with J903,  and bottom right corners
>>>>> fairly near the J903 ones.
>>>>> 
>>>>> # J904 beta
>>>>> [Position]
>>>>> Debug=-590 50 540 500
>>>>> Edit=31 32 1450 700
>>>>> Term=40 22 1400 650
>>>>> 
>>>>> This version of Qt appears not to recognise the screen's physical
>>>>> dimensions,  perhaps.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also,  the font sizes in the Edit Window bars are larger than before.
>>>>> That is,  the edit file name,
>>>>> eg "User/config/qtide.cfg - [User] - Edit"
>>>>> as well as action tabs:
>>>>>      File Edit View etc ..............
>>>>> and file tabs:
>>>>> qtide.cfg | p788.ijs | maze.ijs | polydiv.ijs | etc.........
>>>>> This isn't a problem for me,  but might have diagnostic value.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As before, the version details are:
>>>>> JVERSION
>>>>> Engine: j904/j64avx2/windows
>>>>> Beta-b: commercial/2022-04-12T18:59:13
>>>>> Library: 9.04.01
>>>>> Qt IDE: 2.0.3/6.2.4(6.2.4)
>>>>> Platform: Win 64
>>>>> Installer: J904 install
>>>>> InstallPath: c:/d/j904-beta
>>>>> Contact: www.jsoftware.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks again,
>>>>> 
>>>>> MIke
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For information about J forums see
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to